Skip to content

Does ESMValTool have a general principle on whether it should fail or warn when inputs are missing? #2435

Answered by bouweandela
ehogan asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

There is no guideline available, just use common sense: if the results are still scientifically meaningful with some missing data a warning might be sufficient, if not, raise an error.

Replies: 1 comment 1 reply

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@bouweandela
Comment options

Answer selected by ehogan
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
3 participants