Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Include ability to characterize/classify non-ICA confounds #12

Open
tsalo opened this issue Oct 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Include ability to characterize/classify non-ICA confounds #12

tsalo opened this issue Oct 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@tsalo
Copy link
Member

tsalo commented Oct 6, 2024 •
edited
Loading

I was thinking we could allow users to provide confounds that aren't compatible with our external regressor option, such as statistical maps (e.g., CBF map) or 4D time series (e.g., rapidtide's sLFO regressor, RETROICOR regressors).

Is there some way we could not just characterize these external regressors and refine them to retain TE-independent signals only? Is that even possible?

Related to ME-ICA/tedana#1097.
@tsalo tsalo added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@tsalo