Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Temporarily remove caching steps in Bitrise #11545

Open
9 tasks
Cal-L opened this issue Oct 1, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
9 tasks

Temporarily remove caching steps in Bitrise #11545

Cal-L opened this issue Oct 1, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@Cal-L
Copy link
Contributor

Cal-L commented Oct 1, 2024

What is this about?

Currently, we perform a handful of caching steps between both the build and testing flows in Bitrise. Over the past year, we've been observing a steady stream of failed runs as a result of cache misses or sometimes sporadic behavior. While caching does save us some time for our builds, the time trade-off has been canceled out by the need to support or react whenever e2e failures occur. The purpose of this ticket is to completely remove all caching steps for now and to follow up with tasks to slowly reintroduce cache steps incrementally and to monitor the behavior over a period of time to ensure stability. To contain the scope, we will only focus on removing cache steps for pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline

Scenario

No response

Design

No response

Technical Details

  • Remove all cache steps that is used in the pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline
  • Ensure tests are still running without cache steps
  • Note the diff in run duration relative to main

Threat Modeling Framework

No response

Acceptance Criteria

  • All cache steps should be removed in pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline
  • Tests in pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline should be successful with the exception of failing tests on main (non related to this task)

Stakeholder review needed before the work gets merged

  • Engineering (needed in most cases)
  • Design
  • Product
  • QA (automation tests are required to pass before merging PRs but not all changes are covered by automation tests - please review if QA is needed beyond automation tests)
  • Security
  • Legal
  • Marketing
  • Management (please specify)
  • Other (please specify)

References

No response

@Cal-L Cal-L self-assigned this Oct 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant