Flex scheme

[blond]

flex scheme should support all states between flat and nested.

# original `flat`
blocks/
├── block.tech
├── block_mod.tech
├── block__elem.tech
└── block__elem_mod.tech

# blocks are divided into dirs
blocks/
└── block/
    ├── block.tech
    ├── block_mod.tech
    ├── block__elem.tech
    └── block__elem_mod.tech

# less strict `nested`
# blocks, elems and mods are divided into dirs, but not necessarily
blocks/
└── block/
    ├── _mod/
        └── block_mod.tech
    ├── block__elem.tech
    ├── block__elem_mod.tech
    └── block.tech

# original `nested`
blocks/
└── block/
    ├── __elem/
        ├── _mod/
            └── block__elem_mod.tech
        └── block__elem.tech
    ├── _mod/
        └── block_mod.tech
    └── block.tech

[blond]

@tenorok, it seems that you were talking about something like that ;)

[qfox]

👍

[tenorok]

Yeah! This is the most! Such functionality would be delightful ✨

[qfox]

I wanna say that there are big difference between blocks/block/** and blocks/block_**. So you can't emit block-objects in a middle for flat scheme. I think it's fine for small projects, but it should report object asap for big projects and blocks/block/** schemes.

[blond]

I think it's fine for small projects, but it should report object asap for big projects and blocks/block/** schemes.

For big projects should use the nested scheme.

[qfox]

For big projects should use the nested scheme.

It would be enough to use any scheme with files grouped by block name.