Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Establish one-to-one binding for capabilities #94

Open
alnoki opened this issue Mar 20, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Establish one-to-one binding for capabilities #94

alnoki opened this issue Mar 20, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@alnoki
Copy link
Member

alnoki commented Mar 20, 2023

Presently, custodian capabilities and underwriter capabilities can become a contended resource if they are used in multiple contexts.

Hence a binding schema is proposed, whereby a capability contains a field(s) describing the context in which it should be used.

Also proposed is a "duplicate_cap()" function, which creates a new unbound capability instance from a bound capability, for example so that multiple accounts can be presided over by the same custodian without transaction collisions.

@alnoki alnoki added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 20, 2023
@alnoki alnoki changed the title Establish one-to-one binding for capabilities. Establish one-to-one binding for capabilities Mar 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant