Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Benchmark] Run xetla streamk gemm in benchmark #2438

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ESI-SYD
Copy link
Contributor

@ESI-SYD ESI-SYD commented Oct 8, 2024

No description provided.

@ESI-SYD ESI-SYD linked an issue Oct 8, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@whitneywhtsang
Copy link
Contributor

@ESI-SYD Performance from https://github.com/intel/intel-xpu-backend-for-triton/actions/runs/11230502839 is 240TFlops, the reported performance was 262TFlops, can you investigate why?
There are a lot of printouts like below, can they be cleaned up?

 problem size: (3072,3072), tiled_shape: (12,12), tiles: 144, dp_tiles: 96, sk_tiles: 48, iters_per_tile: 128, num_workgroups: 128, dp_workgroups: 96, dp_waves: 3, sk_groups_per_region: 32, sk_regions: 1, sk_waves: 1, sk_iters_per_normal_group: 192, sk_big_groups_per_region: 0, avail_xecores: 32

Local range: {1, 8, 4} 
SK Score: 51

@ESI-SYD
Copy link
Contributor Author

ESI-SYD commented Oct 9, 2024

@ESI-SYD Performance from https://github.com/intel/intel-xpu-backend-for-triton/actions/runs/11230502839 is 240TFlops, the reported performance was 262TFlops, can you investigate why? There are a lot of printouts like below, can they be cleaned up?

 problem size: (3072,3072), tiled_shape: (12,12), tiles: 144, dp_tiles: 96, sk_tiles: 48, iters_per_tile: 128, num_workgroups: 128, dp_workgroups: 96, dp_waves: 3, sk_groups_per_region: 32, sk_regions: 1, sk_waves: 1, sk_iters_per_normal_group: 192, sk_big_groups_per_region: 0, avail_xecores: 32

Local range: {1, 8, 4} 
SK Score: 51

Let me check, previously I can get ~252 locally

@ESI-SYD ESI-SYD marked this pull request as draft October 9, 2024 03:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[XeTLA] Add StreamK and SplitK implementation
2 participants