Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Hypervisor mode should be discussed. #248

Open
kasanovic opened this issue Jun 21, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Hypervisor mode should be discussed. #248

kasanovic opened this issue Jun 21, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
post-v1.0 To be handled after v1.0

Comments

@kasanovic
Copy link
Contributor

Extension should either be incompatible with hypervisor extension, or behavior specified when hypervisor extension present.
dansmathers added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 2, 2022
@dansmathers
pull for #248/249
8c3b67a 
instead of redefining xtvec.mode as 5:0 of xtvec, created a new field in xtvec called alignment which is bits [5:2].

Signed-off-by: Dan Smathers <[email protected]>
kasanovic added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 2, 2022
@kasanovic
Merge pull request #254 from riscv/dansmathers-patch-12
1b3be5e 
pull for #248/249
dansmathers added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 25, 2022
@dansmathers
simple hypervisor proposal
744ae06 
for issues #248 #247 .  Simple proposal.   using u-mode interrupt encodings with vs-mode interrupts when misa.H = 1.

Signed-off-by: Dan Smathers <[email protected]>
@dansmathers dansmathers mentioned this issue Oct 25, 2022
Closed
@kasanovic
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hypervisor support is not included in current spec, will be added as a possible future extension.

@kasanovic kasanovic mentioned this issue Jan 17, 2023
Closed
@kasanovic kasanovic reopened this Jan 17, 2023
@kasanovic
Copy link
Contributor Author

Reopening to tag as post v1.0 issue.

@kasanovic kasanovic added the post-v1.0 To be handled after v1.0 label Jan 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
post-v1.0 To be handled after v1.0
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@kasanovic