Skip to content

Issues: JuliaTesting/ReTestItems.jl

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

39 Open 30 Closed
39 Open 30 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

failfast should cancel all running test-items when one fails new feature A feature we would like to add perf About improving the performance of the package
#189 opened Sep 18, 2024 by nickrobinson251
Refactor our internal integrationtests.jl file refactor an internal change
#187 opened Sep 18, 2024 by nickrobinson251
Adding methods to existing functions in test setups is not isolated to the users of the setup speculative a feature idea that we are undecided about
#184 opened Sep 16, 2024 by Drvi
Option to print what tests would be run (without running them) speculative a feature idea that we are undecided about
#183 opened Sep 11, 2024 by nickrobinson251
Support @testmodule (as syntax for @testsetup module) speculative a feature idea that we are undecided about
#182 opened Sep 11, 2024 by nickrobinson251
Ability to warn about @testitem calls not in *_test.jl files speculative a feature idea that we are undecided about
#181 opened Sep 11, 2024 by nickrobinson251
Require @testsetup resides in the same file as testitems which use it breaking Requires making a new major release perf About improving the performance of the package speculative a feature idea that we are undecided about
#180 opened Sep 11, 2024 by nickrobinson251
Option to print Julia task backtraces on timeout new feature A feature we would like to add
#175 opened Aug 15, 2024 by nickrobinson251
Ability to inspect test results/perf after a run speculative a feature idea that we are undecided about
#173 opened Aug 7, 2024 by nickrobinson251
Ability to only run failures (and/or to run them first) new feature A feature we would like to add
#172 opened Aug 7, 2024 by nickrobinson251
1
Workers don't terminate after tests finish
#164 opened Jul 19, 2024 by avik-pal
Support thread and task backtraces on OS other than Linux new feature A feature we would like to add
#158 opened May 7, 2024 by nickrobinson251
Ability for skip to report a message saying why a test is skipped speculative a feature idea that we are undecided about
#153 opened Apr 11, 2024 by nickrobinson251
1
Task-local logger is set with nworkers == 0, but not with nworkers > 0
#148 opened Feb 27, 2024 by Drvi
Error when using ReTestItems.jl as a pkg dependency
#147 opened Feb 8, 2024 by findmyway
Discrepency in Worker ID info between logs and XML report bug Something isn't working
#145 opened Jan 29, 2024 by nickrobinson251
1
1
Time spent evaluating test-setups should be reported new feature A feature we would like to add
#141 opened Jan 18, 2024 by nickrobinson251
Time spent evaluating test-setups shouldn't be included in test-item timeout
#140 opened Jan 18, 2024 by nickrobinson251
Support an overall timeout, in addition to testitem_timeout new feature A feature we would like to add
#137 opened Jan 11, 2024 by nickrobinson251
Drop LoggingExtras.jl dependency good first issue Good for newcomers refactor an internal change
#135 opened Jan 8, 2024 by nickrobinson251
Option to make tests fail on logging errors new feature A feature we would like to add
#127 opened Dec 4, 2023 by nickrobinson251
Windows: resource busy or locked (EBUSY) bug Something isn't working help wanted Extra attention is needed
#124 opened Nov 22, 2023 by pxl-th
3
Feature request: option to restart worker in between each test, or every N tests new feature A feature we would like to add
#123 opened Nov 20, 2023 by NHDaly
1
Worker crash in-between running testitems should error gracefully new feature A feature we would like to add
#118 opened Nov 9, 2023 by nickrobinson251
The memory usage computation on MacOS seems to be wrong help wanted Extra attention is needed
#113 opened Oct 5, 2023 by bvdmitri
3
ProTip! Add no:assignee to see everything that’s not assigned.