Change include path in wgpu.h

[eliemichel]

The generated release zips files are organized as follows:

 - include/
   - webgpu/
     - webgpu.h
   - wgpu/
     - wgpu.h
 - lib/
   - ...

However, wgpu.h includes webgpu.h with #include "webgpu.h", which forces to add include/webgpu/ to the include directories, while it feels more idiomatic to only include include/. Other implementations also have webgpu.h in a include/webgpu/ subfolder so I suggest leaving this so, leading to two possible fixes:

• Option A: Change the include path in wgpu.h (this PR)
• Option B: Distribute wgpu.h in include/webgpu/ instead of include/wgpu/ (what I had been doing manually in my distributions so far) -> edit: alternative PR for this option: Distribute wgpu.h in include/webgpu #425

[almarklein]

@rajveermalviya and @Sahnvour thoughts?

I don't really care personally (I made wgpu-py find the files regardless of folder structure 😅).

[rajveermalviya]

Thanks for catching this issue, @eliemichel!

Updating the checked-in file directly would cause problems with bindgen, and since this only impacts package builds, the best approach (for now) is to update the Makefile instead:

diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 6a5546e..ddea760 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ package: lib-native lib-native-release
                cp ./dist/wgpu-native-git-tag                 dist/$$ARCHIVEDIR; \
                cp ./ffi/webgpu-headers/webgpu.h              dist/$$ARCHIVEDIR/include/webgpu; \
                cp ./ffi/wgpu.h                               dist/$$ARCHIVEDIR/include/wgpu; \
+               sed -i '' 's/"webgpu.h"/<webgpu\/webgpu.h>/'  dist/$$ARCHIVEDIR/include/wgpu/wgpu.h; \
                if [ $(OS_NAME) = linux ]; then \
                        cp ./$$LIBDIR/libwgpu_native.so           dist/$$ARCHIVEDIR/lib; \
                        cp ./$$LIBDIR/libwgpu_native.a            dist/$$ARCHIVEDIR/lib; \

For reference, the folder structure was updated in #417 and #419, but we missed updating the include path because there’s no testing infrastructure for the built archives at the moment.

[almarklein]

I know I said I don't care ... but changing the contents of a file in the makefile is rather unexpected and may cause confusion.

What about option B? Keeping webgpu.h and wgpu.h together does feel nice and simple, and wgpu.h basically defines 'extensions' so webgpu, so it kinda makes sense (to me)?

[Sahnvour]

IMHO option B is simpler and more intuitive, I don't think it causes any trouble to have both headers in the same folder.

[eliemichel]

If Option B feels like a better solution, here is an alternative PR (which indeed only affects the Makefile): #425

[almarklein]

Thanks @eliemichel! Closing in favor of #425