Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove Data Platform OMAS #5319

Closed
planetf1 opened this issue Jun 4, 2021 · 8 comments
Closed

Remove Data Platform OMAS #5319

planetf1 opened this issue Jun 4, 2021 · 8 comments
Assignees

Comments

@planetf1
Copy link
Member

planetf1 commented Jun 4, 2021

In #5314 some atlas/ranger etc related code was removed and it was noted that Data Engine OMAS can now be removed, since it's capabilities have been replaced by Integration Services

However currently the cassandra metadata extractor depends on Data Engine, so it seems prudent to remove the cassandra metadata extractor first (cc: @lpalashevski )and then return to complete the removal of data engine omas

@mandy-chessell
Copy link
Contributor

Data Platform OMAS?

@cmgrote
Copy link
Member

cmgrote commented Jun 4, 2021

As far as I know Data Engine OMAS is still used extensively for lineage (?)

@lpalashevski
Copy link
Contributor

lpalashevski commented Jun 4, 2021

Data Platform OMAS?
I hope so :)

Duly noted @planetf1. I will consider this and have step to remove Data Platform OMAS as part of the cassandra metadata extractor removal activity. I will create new issue to track this and link it here. Lets update the title on this though to say "Remove Data Platfom OMAS".

@planetf1 planetf1 changed the title Remove Data Engine OMAS Remove Data Platform OMAS Jun 4, 2021
@planetf1
Copy link
Member Author

planetf1 commented Jun 4, 2021

@mandy-chessell @cmgrote @lpalashevski Yes 'data platform'. Apologies. So many overlapping terms causing mental capacity overflow

@lpalashevski
Copy link
Contributor

@mandy-chessell I need confirmation, removing Data Platform OMAS also implies removing the dedicated governance server (data-platform-services) including admin-services and documentation parts, right?

@mandy-chessell
Copy link
Contributor

@lpalashevski yes :) - except leave the following file ...
https://github.com/odpi/egeria/blob/master/open-metadata-implementation/admin-services/docs/concepts/data-platform-server.md

@lpalashevski
Copy link
Contributor

lpalashevski commented Jun 9, 2021

@lpalashevski yes :) - except leave the following file ...
https://github.com/odpi/egeria/blob/master/open-metadata-implementation/admin-services/docs/concepts/data-platform-server.md

This is now addressed in #5344

Some occurences of Data Platform services in admin modules are not removed to preserve backward compatibility i.e. checks in server type classifier that I think are still needed (that pulls in configuration document and related classes...)

We can disscuss it on the community call 10/06/2021 and decide if we completely remove the support.

@planetf1
Copy link
Member Author

this has now been completed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants