feat(DeleteModal): first version

[adamviktora]

Closes #2

[nicolethoen]

Aria labels need to be configurable for internationalization purposes

[jgiardino]

I'd recommend using the text that displays above the text input as the aria-label for this text input. This text visibly functions as the text input label, and it would be better to reference the visible text, rather than require consumers to specify this text in 2 places.

You can do this by providing an id on the div that wraps this text, and an aria-labelledby attribute on the <TextInput> component that references the id value for the text.

But I do agree with @nicolethoen's comment above that this text needs to be configurable:

Type RedHatAwesome to confirm deletion:

[nicolethoen]

same with titles

[patternfly-build]

Preview: https://AI-infra-ui-components-pr-ai-infra-ui-components-3.surge.sh

A11y report: https://AI-infra-ui-components-pr-ai-infra-ui-components-3-a11y.surge.sh

[jgiardino]

These examples look great! Something I'd like for us to consider as we build out components is to make sure we aren't inadvertently promoting microcopy patterns that we don't want.

For example, for the extra destructive variant includes the following message in the original content design document:

The item-name [item] and all of its resources will be deleted.

But this content pattern isn't reflected in the example.

We can and should reference our design/content patterns as part of these examples under the design guidelines tab, but I'd also like to consider how content patterns are reflected in the UI component examples. Consumers are likely to assume that UI component examples embody recommended patterns and will not refer to design guidelines to confirm otherwise.

One option is to use contents that are clearly placeholder text (i.e. text that describes what type of contents are recommended). Another option is to use contents that demonstrate the pattern. Or we could do a mix of both, for example:

The item-name [item] will be deleted. [Brief sentence describing consequence of action].

@nicolethoen @simrandhaliw - Do you have any preferences on this?