Update index.html

expand on the 'if possible' paragraph to call out that it'd be better for authors to use the button element instead of these legacy (though still valid) input button types.
w3c · Feb 16, 2024 · da87e9a · da87e9a
1 parent 1339fde
commit da87e9a
Showing 1 changed file with 6 additions and 3 deletions.
diff --git a/index.html b/index.html
@@ -1847,7 +1847,8 @@ <h2 id="docconformance">
                   and any `aria-*` attributes applicable to the allowed roles.
                 </p>
                 <p>
-                  If possible, authors SHOULD consider using a different HTML element which allows the specified role.
+                  If possible, authors SHOULD consider using a different HTML element which allows the specified role,
+                  such as the `button` element.
                 </p>
               </div>
             </td>
@@ -1984,7 +1985,8 @@ <h2 id="docconformance">
                   and any `aria-*` attributes applicable to the allowed roles.
                 </p>
                 <p>
-                  If possible, authors SHOULD consider using a different HTML element which allows the specified role.
+                  If possible, authors SHOULD consider using a different HTML element which allows the specified role,
+                  such as the `button` element.
                 </p>
               </div>
             </td>
@@ -2039,7 +2041,8 @@ <h2 id="docconformance">
                   and any `aria-*` attributes applicable to the allowed roles.
                 </p>
                 <p>
-                  If possible, authors SHOULD consider using a different HTML element which allows the specified role.
+                  If possible, authors SHOULD consider using a different HTML element which allows the specified role,
+                  such as the `button` element.
                 </p>
               </div>
             </td>